I'm hearing tons of rumours that we are changing the club crest? Anyone know if this is true, or a bunch of (supposed) ITK's acting the mick? For example, from RAWK: So, could we be going back to something more traditional, like this from the 80's? I love the old/retro style myself, but don't know what to make of it changing as a matter of point. What are the opinions on this, if true?
the above has no hillsborough flame on it? I for one dont think they will exclude the hillsborough flames Its more ITK bullshit, they might change it they might not but nobody knows IMO
I know, according to your man there will be a flame. But the insinuation overall is that we are going back to something traditional like that which I posted. While it's hardly going to be something like this, it's a nice design concept in a sense:
Agree with you on the Hillsborough Flame can't see it been left off any future crests, less we forget what happened that day. God bless them.
There is a possibility the new kit design has been seen. It needs to be designed first then manufactured, and there is always a chance that someone shows it to a friend of a friend etc.. Rgds The Pernicious One
ISTANBUL VET that kit looks nice. But it will be a travesty if they attempt to leave the eternal flame out. I will boycott merch and stop going to games again etc if its excluded.
Calm down,as you know it was something that was drawn up on RAWK. Let's be honest the badge at the minute is a bit of a dog's dinner,the rumours are that it is to be redesigned so pare it down and include the flame.
I understand that, was just stating my stance on IF there is no flame. The other pic you posted is nice looking crest.
Come on guys,we all know the flame is as much part of any badge as the liverbird and so it should be it goes without saying.
Is that robbed or did you design that Frank? Anyone else think that would make a good banner, especially with us in the market for one?