This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.

Told to take banner down?

Discussion in 'General LFC Discussion' started by wonit6times, Sep 27, 2009.

  1. wonit6times

    wonit6times
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    2,038
    Likes Received:
    34
    Why were the lads told to take the banner down at the front of the kop yesterday by the police??
    What differance to them does it make?
    Cant be because of health & safety as there have been loads before and nothin said!!
    That little cnut must have told the police to whip it down, whatever happened to freedom of speech and all that.......:mad:
     
  2. dubit10

    dubit10
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    3,952
    Likes Received:
    238
    It's part of a pattern. I'd say within the next 3 years or so all banners/flags will be banned from the ground. Football as i knew it is dead and has been for a while now TBH.
     
  3. maloneavic

    maloneavic
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,394
    Likes Received:
    200
    Exactly.

    I think in around 4 years or so no banners will be allowed to be brought in to the ground and we will all be given free plastic flags.
     
  4. rev

    rev
    Expand Collapse
    Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,930
    Likes Received:
    20
    Don't think banners will be banned! In this instance the banner was something about the yanks so i'm sure they were instructed by that cnut gillete. He was probably p*ssed off at the SOS protest at the back of the directors box!
     
  5. liamo3

    liamo3
    Expand Collapse
    Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    4,677
    Likes Received:
    509
    They were told to take it down because a certain yank found it offensive....Truth hurts hey George??
     
  6. Beanokelly

    Beanokelly
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2009
    Messages:
    6,073
    Likes Received:
    504
    What did it say
     
  7. barnieslad

    barnieslad
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2

    Tom & George tell Lie$
     
  8. denashpot

    denashpot
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,924
    Likes Received:
    11
    Very good. Obviously hit a nerve with the cnut!
     
  9. Beanokelly

    Beanokelly
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2009
    Messages:
    6,073
    Likes Received:
    504
    Well that's the truth.They do say the truth hurts
     
  10. Wayne

    Wayne
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    1
    As you say it hit a nerve so the flag worked even if it was taken down
     
  11. rev

    rev
    Expand Collapse
    Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,930
    Likes Received:
    20
    Exactly! The protest outside the ground must have got to the cnut
     
  12. Gerry

    Gerry
    Expand Collapse
    Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    17,055
    Likes Received:
    4,979
    The bizzies doing the clubs dirty work !

    Yanks out now
     
  13. barnieslad

    barnieslad
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2

    What they did yesterday was fundamentally wrong. The reason they told us to take those banners down was because they considered them to be an obstruction.

    How is this an obstruction..

    [​IMG]





    And yet this isn't..

    [​IMG]



    Not only are LFC using an image of our non obstruction for the Proey but they are selling photo's of it..

    http://liverpoolfc.allsportgallery....paisley&Team=Liverpool&Count=10&Start=0&End=9
     
  14. wonit6times

    wonit6times
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    2,038
    Likes Received:
    34
    double standards

    Why cant they just be honest with yous and say the little yanky prick is 'upset' by the banners and told us to get rid of them
     
  15. Sim Sala Bim

    Sim Sala Bim
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    6,185
    Likes Received:
    2
  16. General

    General
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    910
    Likes Received:
    7
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From Tony Barrett

    Neither George Gillett Jr nor Tom Hicks, the co-owners of Liverpool, is expecting imminent investment in the club from Prince Faisal bin Fahd bin Abdullah al-Saud, a member of the Saudi Royal Family, despite reports to the contrary over the weekend.

    Hicks and Gillett are in ongoing talks with a number of potential third-party investors as they seek first to reduce Liverpool’s £250 million debt and second to bring in the kind of sizeable cash injection needed to finance the club’s move from Anfield to a long-planned new stadium on nearby Stanley Park.

    Prince Faisal, who visited the club’s academy in Kirkby on Saturday before attending Liverpool’s home match against Hull City, is the latest potential investor to express an interest in taking a stake in the club and his public admission to this effect has come as a surprise to Hicks in particular, but also to Gillett.

    According to a report in Saudi Al-Riyadh, the newspaper, Prince Faisal, who chairs Fama Group, the Saudi holding company, and the F6 Sports Investment Firm, is willing to take a stake in Liverpool of up to 50 per cent for a fee in the region of £200-350 million.

    The high-profile nature of his reported interest, which began on Friday night with a news item on television in Saudi Arabia, has taken the Liverpool hierarchy aback, particularly Gillett who invited Prince Faisal to Merseyside as his guest to open negotiations about proposed Nascar and Liverpool academy initiatives in the Middle East. Gillett is holding talks with a number of interested parties at present and, as yet, there is still to be an official approach from Prince Faisal or any other members of the Saudi Royal Family.

    In the past two years, Hicks and Gillett have entertained a number of potential investors at Anfield, but a deal is yet to materialise and The Times understands that Gillett held talks with another interested party in London last night.

    Gillett’s visit to Merseyside was not without controversy as members of the Spirit Of Shankly (SOS) fans group, which has long been opposed to his and Hicks’s regime, protested against the American ownership of Liverpool at the club’s Melwood training ground.

    An attempt to stage a similar protest at Anfield during the Hull game was stifled when flags and banners criticising Hicks and Gillett were seized by Merseyside Police shortly after they were unfurled in the Kop stand.
     
  17. rev

    rev
    Expand Collapse
    Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,930
    Likes Received:
    20
    Brilliant! Didn't see it myself, was up in 208. Just seen the police floating about! Yank cnut must have told the stewards who didn't have the b*lls to do it themselves
     
  18. justydawson

    justydawson
    Expand Collapse
    One & Only

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,723
    Likes Received:
    58
    this is brilliant, and needs to be kept up on a weekly basis

    The protests are being noticed now
    That with a "potential buyer"... (hoping!) ... they see that the clubs in a state, the fans arent happy.

    I just hope SOS address the fact that they are representing a lot of people, and a lot of people are unhappy - banning people from Anfield will blow up in their face.
     

Share This Page